{"id":2968,"date":"2007-09-22T16:46:17","date_gmt":"2007-09-22T16:46:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deptfordtv.wordpress.com\/2007\/09\/22\/open-knowledge-conference-limehouse-london-17th-march-2007\/"},"modified":"2007-09-22T16:46:17","modified_gmt":"2007-09-22T16:46:17","slug":"open-knowledge-conference-limehouse-london-17th-march-2007-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/?p=2968","title":{"rendered":"open knowledge conference, limehouse, london, 17th march 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre>                    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/wiki\/okcon2007\/material\">Open Knowledge 1.0<\/a>\n            Saturday 17th March 2007, 1100-1830\n                    Limehouse Town Hall\n                http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/\n          Organized by the Open Knowledge Foundation\n\n  * Programme: http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/programme\/\n  * Registration: http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/register\/\n  * Wiki: http:\/\/okfn.org\/wiki\/okcon\/<\/pre>\n<pre>  * http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/after\/\n\nOn the 17th March 2007 the first all-day Open Knowledge event is taking\nplace in London. This event will bring together individuals and groups\nfrom across the open knowledge spectrum and includes panels on open\nmedia, open geodata and open scientific and civic information.\n\nThe event is open to all but we encourage you to register because space\nis limited. A small entrance fee of \u00ac\u00a310 is planned to help pay for costs\nbut concessions are available.\n\n## Speakers\n\n### Open Scientific and Civic Data\n\n  * Tim Hubbard, leader of the Human Genome Analysis Group at the Sanger\n    Institute\n  * Peter Murray-Rust, Professor in the Unilever Centre for Molecular\n    Science Informatics at Cambridge University\n  * John Sheridan, Head of e-Services at the Office of Public Sector\n    Information\n\n### Geodata and Civic Information\n\n  * Ed Parsons, until recently CTO of the Ordnance Survey\n  * Steve Coast, founder of Open Street Map\n  * Charles Arthur, freeourdata.org.uk and Technology Editor of the\n    Guardian\n\n### Open Media\n\n  * Paula Ledieu, formerly Director of the BBC's Creative Archive\n    project and now Managing Director and Director of Open Media for\n    Magic Lantern Productions\n  * Fleur Knopperts of DocAgora\n  * Zoe Young of http:\/\/www.transmission.cc\/\n\n## Theme: Atomisation and Commercial Opportunity\n\nDiscussions of 'Open Knowledge' often end with licensing wars: legal\narguments, technicalities, and ethics. While those debates rage on, Open\nKnowledge 1.0 will concentrate on two pragmatic and often-overlooked\naspects of Open Knowledge: atomisation and commercial possibility.\n\nAtomisation on a large scale (such as in the Debian 'apt' packaging\nsystem) has allowed large software projects to employ an amazing degree\nof decentralised, collaborative and incremental development. But what\nother kinds of knowledge can be atomised? What are the opportunities and\nproblems of this approach for forms of knowledge other than Software?\n\nAtomisation also holds a key to commercial opportunity: unrestricted\naccess to an ever-changing, atomised landscape of knowledge creates\ncommercial opportunities that are not available with proprietary\napproaches. What examples are there of commercial systems that function\nwith Open Knowledge, and how can those systems be shared?\n\nBringing together open threads from Science, Geodata, Civic Information\nand Media, Open Knowledge 1.0 is an opportunity for people and projects\nto meet, talk and plan things.<\/pre>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<h1>Open Knowledge 1<\/h1>\n<p class=\"attribute-byline\">\n<p class=\"source\">Source: http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/news\/open_knowledge_1<\/p>\n<p class=\"hide\">21\/03\/2007<\/p>\n<p class=\"attribute-short\">The Open Knowledge 1 conference demonstrates the value to be gained from opening up data and information.<\/p>\n<p class=\"attribute-long\"><a id=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1\" title=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1\" name=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h4>London: Saturday, 17th March 2007<\/h4>\n<p>The old <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Limehouse_Town_Hall\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Lime House Town Hall<\/a> in east London built in a by gone age (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.limehousetownhall.org.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1879<\/a>) hosts an Information Age event organised by the Open Knowledge Foundation. The Open Knowledge Foundation is a not for profit organisation that is incorporated in the United Kingdom as a company limited by guarantee.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Knowledge Foundation<\/a> exists to promote the openness of knowledge in all its forms, in the belief that freer access to information will have far-reaching social and commercial benefits.<\/p>\n<p>The event titled Open Knowledge 1 focussed on two pragmatic aspects of <strong>Open Knowledge: atomisation and commercial possibility<\/strong>. This theme was developed throughout the day via an interesting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/okcon_programme_the_open_knowledge_foundation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">programme<\/a> that brought together the Science, Geodata, Civic Information and Media communities. The event concluded with a series of short sharp workshops that covered a broad range of topics.<\/p>\n<p>The programme opened with an <a href=\"http:\/\/m.okfn.org\/files\/okcon\/2007\/talks\/intro_rufus_pollock\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">introduction<\/a> from Rufus Pollock of the Open Knowledge Foundation. Rufus explained the objectives of the Open Knowledge Foundation and then the audience of 80+ people considered and took part in active debate following a series of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/after\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">presentations<\/a> grouped under the headings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Open Geodata, chaired by Becky Hogge of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.openrightsgroup.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Rights Group<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Open Media, chaired by Andrea Rota of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.liquidculture.info\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Liquid Culture<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Open Scientific and Civic Information, chaired by <a href=\"http:\/\/mappinghacks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jo Walsh<\/a> of the Open Knowledge Foundation and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.osgeo.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OSGeo<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a id=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_1\" title=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_1\" name=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h5>Session 1: Open Geodata<\/h5>\n<p>An audio recording of this session has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opengeodata.org\/casts\/okcon2007\/okcon.mp3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">published<\/a>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Presentation 1: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/geo_ed_parsons_170307\" target=\"_self\">Open Geodata &#8211; Some personal thoughts<\/a> given by Ed Parsons of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edparsons.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Geomatics<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Presentation 2: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/openstreetmap_scoast_170307\" target=\"_self\">OpenStreetMap<\/a> given by Steve Coast of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.openstreetmap.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OpenStreetMap<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Presentation 3: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/geo_charles_arthur_170307\" target=\"_self\">Free Our Data<\/a>: A Technology Guardian <a href=\"http:\/\/www.freeourdata.org.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">campaign<\/a> given by Charles Arthur, Technology Editor of the Guardian<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A range of topics then arose in the discussion that followed as a result of questions raised by the audience. The topics discussed included amongst others:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>UK Ordnance Survey of Great Britain \u2013 behaviour of a monopoly, pricing, licencing, data quality, NIMSA, internal culture, led and dominated by the legal people employed.<\/li>\n<li>Role of legal advisors \u2013 they are involved in all parts of the business process but the Business Managers should be taking the decisions and guiding the organisation not the legal advisors.<\/li>\n<li>The role of the UK HM Treasury \u2013 lack of policy, Corporation Tax, not recognising the Information Society changes and that their policy needs to change<\/li>\n<li>The Role of politicians \u2013 they need to be challenged<\/li>\n<li>Whether Civic campaigns brought about change or rather direct action to over come the immediate issue lead to change in culture and policy. For example \u2013 providing maps for all by capturing topographic data and making that available.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a id=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_2\" title=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_2\" name=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_2\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h5>Session 2: Open Media<\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li>Presentation 1 given by Paula Ledieu of Open Media at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.magiclantern.co.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Magic Lantern Productions<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Presentation 2 given by Susana Noguero and Olivier Schulbaum of <a href=\"http:\/\/platoniq.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Platoniq<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Presentation 3 given by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/transmission_zoe_170307\" target=\"_self\">Zoe Young<\/a>, coordinator of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.transmission.cc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Transmission<\/a> metadata working group.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A range of topics then arose in the discussion that followed as a result of questions raised by the audience. The topics discussed included amongst others:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Metadata \u2013 metadata interoperability, why not <a href=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WWW Consortium<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/creativearchive.bbc.co.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BBC Creative Archive<\/a> \u2013 what can be done to ensure the BBC opens up the archives that they hold on behalf of society? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/info\/policies\/charter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BBC Charter<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/bbctrust\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BBC Trust<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Understanding the collaboration process<\/li>\n<li>Business models<\/li>\n<li>Middle Class approach \u2013 most people have to focus on earning a living there is limited time available for voluntary activities such as some presented.<\/li>\n<li>Educational aspects: How to create a community. How to respond to a community.<\/li>\n<li>Human nature and the herd instinct.<\/li>\n<li>Life cycles: how long are people interested in particular information and initiatives.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a id=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_3\" title=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_3\" name=\"eztoc34618_0_0_1_3\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h5>Session 3: Open Scientific and Civic Information<\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li>Presentation 1: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/science_tim_hubbard_170307\" target=\"_self\">Open science, Open data, Open products<\/a> given by Tim Hubbard, leader of the Human Genome Analysis Group at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sanger.ac.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sanger Institute<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Presentation 2: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ch.cam.ac.uk\/staff\/pm.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Peter Murray-Rust<\/a>, Professor in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www-ucc.ch.cam.ac.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics at Cambridge University<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Presentation 3: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/media\/files\/science_john_sheridan_170307__1\" target=\"_self\">Reflections on Civic Information<\/a> given by John Sheridan Head of e-Services at the UK <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opsi.gov.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Office of Public Sector Information<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A range of topics then arose in the discussion that followed as a result of questions raised by the audience. The topics discussed included amongst others:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Transformation government policy: too many web sites<\/li>\n<li>Allowing society to contribute by opening up the data: public sector spends too much time thinking about a solution before delivering it, allow innovation to operate, need to enable parallel paths and peer pressure competition to operate, allow the community to assist rather than be held at arms length.<\/li>\n<li>Skills \u2013 the society is skill rich and has a role to play.<\/li>\n<li>Use of click-Use-Licences<\/li>\n<li>EU initiatives and frameworks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The day clearly demonstrated that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The information society was very broad as it touched on most human interest areas and as such no one part of society has the complete knowledge and skills to develop the knowledge economy.<\/li>\n<li>Opening up public sector data as well as that of large private sector publishing organisation&#8217;s would enable society to develop the information society in parallel with the Government initiatives.<\/li>\n<li>Knowledge and skills existed throughout society and that this would continue to grow as a result of the changing demography within Europe (The aging society and shrinking workforce). Opening data would enable this latent force of knowledge and skills to contribute to, participate in and benefit from the Information Society.<\/li>\n<li>The information age was clearly challenging the old models and methods developed and adopted by large organisation&#8217;s whether they be in the public sector or private sector and that they were slow to adapt.<\/li>\n<li>Civil society through direct action provided the catalyst for change.<\/li>\n<li>Infrastructure initiatives needed to ensure all parts of society were involved not just one part.<\/li>\n<li>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lse.ac.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">London School of Economics and Political Science<\/a> (LSE) <a href=\"http:\/\/booth.lse.ac.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Charles Booth Online Archive<\/a> (Charles Booth and the survey into life and labour in London (1886 &#8211; 1903)) <a href=\"http:\/\/booth.lse.ac.uk\/cgi-bin\/do.pl?sub=view_booth_and_barth&amp;args=536772,181035,1,large,0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">map of Lime House Town Hall<\/a> summarises the issue neatly as the Charles Booth map is available and the comparison with the map of today from a private sector is also available!<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>ePSI<\/strong><strong><em>plus<\/em><\/strong> analyst <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epsiplus.net\/epsiplus\/contacts\/epsiplus_network_analysts\/chris_corbin\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chris Corbin<\/a> whom filed this report attended the Open Foundation 1 meeting.<\/p>\n<h1>Freeing the Data in London<\/h1>\n<h6><span class=\"right\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerforsocialmedia.org\/blogs\/future_of_public_media\/freeing_the_data_in_london\/#email\">email<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerforsocialmedia.org\/blogs\/future_of_public_media\/freeing_the_data_in_london\/#discuss\">discuss<\/a><\/span> Posted by Jessica Clark on Mar 20, 2007 at 7:46 AM<\/h6>\n<p>quoted from http:\/\/www.centerforsocialmedia.org\/blogs\/future_of_public_media\/freeing_the_data_in_london\/<\/p>\n<p>How much access should members of the public have to the data and media projects that their tax dollars fund? How about corporations looking to make a buck from government-financed data? Does information really \u201cwant to be free,\u201d as Stewart Brand <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Information_wants_to_be_free\">famously pronounced more than two decades ago<\/a>, and if so, who\u2019s going to pay for its production?<\/p>\n<p>These and other questions were on the table at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/\">Open Knowledge 1.0<\/a> gathering this past weekend. Radical geographers, documentary filmmakers, DNA researchers and UK bureaucrats were among the panelists and audience members at London\u2019s grubby but vibrant <a href=\"http:\/\/www.limehousetownhall.org.uk\/lth_about\">Limehouse Town Hall<\/a>. What motivated this disparate bunch to devote their sunny Saturday to data? A passionate belief that information becomes more valuable when everyone is free to repurpose it.<\/p>\n<p>Rufus Pollock, executive director of the Open Knowledge Foundation, kicked off the event by exploring the day\u2019s themes of \u201catomization and commercial possibility.\u201d From \u201cgenes to geodata, statistics to sonnets,\u201d he suggested, data differs, but commonalities are greater. He noted that software developers have a rich history of open source practices for developing collaborative and iterative projects like the Linux-based operating system <a href=\"http:\/\/www.debian.org\/\">Debian<\/a>; the idea now is to migrate those habits and legal structures to other disciplines.<\/p>\n<p>According to Pollock, software development has learned to effectively atomize information processing, parsing out packets of coding to discrete individuals and stringing them back together into a working whole. Versioning systems, tagging, and numbered releases are all examples of practices that can be applied to other modes of knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>Such a divide-and-conquer approach \u201callows us to deal with complexity,\u201d he said. \u201cWithout it we\u2019d be hopeless\u201d His remarks reflect a similar realization in the creative arts\u2014that the future is in aggregation and recombination, that reuse is the new creativity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mapping for the people<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Becky Hogge, executive director of the Open Rights Group, moderated the day\u2019s first panel on open geodata\u2014a topic that has become particularly hot with the rising popularity of Google\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/googlemapsmania.blogspot.com\/\">map-based mashups<\/a>. Panelists included Charles Arthur, the <a href=\"http:\/\/technology.guardian.co.uk\/weekly\/\">technology editor<\/a> of <em>The Guardian<\/em> and a principal organizer of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.freeourdata.org.uk\/\">Free Our Data<\/a> campaign; Ed Parsons, the former CTO of Britain\u2019s national mapping agency, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk\/oswebsite\/\">Ordnance Survey<\/a>; and Steve Coast, the founder of <a href=\"http:\/\/wiki.openstreetmap.org\/\">Open Street Map<\/a>, a project that allows ordinary people to create collaborative digital maps by participating in \u201cmapping parties\u201d in which they attach GPS devices to their cars, bikes or persons and wander an agreed-upon region. Volunteers then translate these \u201ctraces\u201d into lines, which are merged with existing public domain maps to provide up-to-date renderings.<\/p>\n<p>Parsons kicked off the session by agreeing that government-funded geographical information should be more openly available, but noting that it is both expensive to produce and not particularly politically compelling. \u201cGeodata doesn\u2019t get votes,\u201d he said. He suggested that the answer lies in more innovative, less bureaucratic licensing of the data for different uses.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast to the United States, which places federally funded information in the public domain, Britain keeps much of its government-funded data under wraps, charging taxpayers, corporations and other government agencies to use it. Parsons had headed up an effort to provide more geodata for noncommercial use via an Ordnance Survey project dubbed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.silicon.com\/publicsector\/0,3800010403,39163696,00.htm\">OpenSpace<\/a>, the hope of which was to \u201cfill in the white space that is the gaps between the roads.\u201d But the project has been scuttled for now, and he wasn\u2019t able to provide details about what had happened to it.<\/p>\n<p>Coast explained how his OpenStreetMap project is leading the charge against government ownership of geodata by harnessing the energy of volunteers to generate up-to-the minute maps, a \u201cgrassroots remapping.\u201d The work of OpenStreetMap has revealed some of the tricks of commercial map-makers, who place small \u201ceaster eggs,\u201d or false cul-de-sacs, in their maps to detect and prevent copyright infringement. OpenStreetMappers around the world can contribute to the \u201cFree Wiki World Map\u201d on the group\u2019s site, and the process is \u201catomized,\u201d because different volunteers perform different steps along the way. While the project is in is infancy, Coast suggested, it will gather momentum as data is added, putting pressure on private and government map-makers to lower the price of their information.<\/p>\n<p>Arthur picked up the call for more public geodata with an explanation of his Free Our Data campaign, the goal of which is to make \u201cimpersonal data collected by the UK government organizations available for the cost of reproduction\u2014which for digital is zero.\u201d He explained that there\u2019s some funny math happening within the government\u2019s accounting: taxpayers dollars are used to produce one agency\u2019s information, and that agency turns around and sells it to another agency for a profit, creating a false market value. \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of data in there,\u201d he said, \u201cthe trouble is that we can\u2019t get it out.\u201d He characterized data as the \u201cmitochondria in the cell of government,\u201d and suggested that by putting it in the public domain the government would both rid itself of administrative costs and significantly benefit the UK economy. He offered South Africa as an example\u2014in 2000 the government made its maps available for free, and use of the data has grown by 500 percent.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think this is a conspiracy, it\u2019s a cock-up,\u201d commented Parsons. \u201cGovernment really doesn\u2019t understand the value of the data that it\u2019s sitting on.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Content, copyright and community-building<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The next panel examined some of the technological and legal underpinnings that are determining the use and distribution of digital media. Paula Ledieu, the director of Open Media at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.magiclantern.co.uk\/\">Magic Lantern Productions<\/a>, and the former project director for the BBC\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/creativearchive.bbc.co.uk\/\">Creative Archive<\/a> project, spoke about the potential of open content and the challenges of licensing media in the digital age. She lauded the current explosion of user-generated archives like Flickr, \u201can extraordinary body of still images as a repository for us\u2026a few years ago this would have sounded like a utopian la-la land.\u201d However, content producers are still having a hard time finding visual, film and audio that is in the public domain. And, she warned, license experiments like Creative Commons risk creating \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/weblog\/entry\/5701\">content ghettos<\/a>.\u201d She also noted that open culture experiments like the BBC\u2019s Creative Archive are at risk; the project is currently closed down as the BBC puts it through a \u201cpublic value test.\u201d Measurements for assessing the value of such resources are scarce and poorly understood; Ledieu encouraged audience members to explore this area further, and in a later presentation, to respond to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ofcom.org.uk\/consult\/condocs\/pspnewapproach\/newapproach.pdf\">a whitepaper<\/a> published by Ofcom (the UK\u2019s version of the FCC) about the role and structure of public media in the digital era.<\/p>\n<p>Other panelists offered examples for how content producers can engage with open information practices. A duo of presenters from <a href=\"http:\/\/platoniq.net\/\">Platoniq<\/a>, a Barcelona-based collective, described a series of projects designed to combine open media distribution with public spaces, such as <a href=\"http:\/\/tiki.burnstation.org\/\">Burn Station<\/a>. Their <a href=\"http:\/\/openserver.cccb.org\/bck\/\">Bank of Common Knowledge<\/a> project adapts the techniques of peer-to-peer media sharing to peer-to-peer education, allowing discrete chunks of information to be broken down and passed on via a network of volunteers. Presenters from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.transmission.cc\/\">Transmission<\/a> project described an international effort to develop open metadata standards for digital documentary film; the effort would make it easier for viewers to find the films online. They urged audience members to \u201cjoin them in the fight for the freedom of the feeds.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>The science of openness<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The final panel of the day tackled the question of how scientists might more easily gain access to data and research, often restricted by proprietary corporate ownership or the copyright protections of scientific journal publishers. Tim Hubbard, the leader of the Human Genome Analysis Group at the Sanger Institute, described how the process of opening up information about the human genome during a multi-organization collaborative research effort both made the research more effective and ensured that the data would remain in the public domain. The result was a shift in both scientific and corporate understanding of why it makes sense to \u201cfree the data.\u201d Even companies are now agreeing, he said, that there\u2019s \u201cpre-competitive\u201d information which it benefits everyone to have access to. He noted some current experiments in liberating pharmaceutical data from corporate control for pressing public health issues like malaria. \u201cBiology is too complex for any organization to have a monopoly on data or ideas,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>And yet, the scientific process of publishing research in peer-reviewed journals does often create a monopoly on news about new discoveries, held by influential publications like <em>Nature<\/em>. Peter Murray-Rust, a chemist based at Cambridge, described the efforts of the American Chemical Society to crack down on an open database of chemical structures, and praised the efforts of the Wellcome Trust to support open access scholarly publishing. He pointed audience members to the <a href=\"http:\/\/wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk\/wwmm.html\">World Wide Molecular Matrix,<\/a> an open respository of chemical information and molecules.<\/p>\n<p>John Sheridan, the head of e-services for the UK government\u2019s Office of Public Sector Information rounded out the day by trying to defend the official stance on public sector information, and to explain that they\u2019re dancing as fast as they can. The audience was not impressed.<\/p>\n<p>Formal panels were followed by informal presentations of a few interesting projects, including a proposed <a href=\"http:\/\/sp-ark.typepad.com\/blog\/\"> multimedia archive<\/a> of the works of filmmaker Sally Potter, a database of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicdomainworks.net\/\">public domain<\/a> works, and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.undemocracy.com\/\">forthcoming project<\/a> to make obscure but crucial U.N. documents more accessible to members of the public.<\/p>\n<p>Proprietary system designers, grabby governments, and privatizing corporations beware! This was only version 1.0 of this intriguing event.<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Open Knowledge 1.0 Saturday 17th March 2007, 1100-1830 Limehouse Town Hall http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/ Organized by the Open Knowledge Foundation * Programme: http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/programme\/ * Registration: http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/register\/ * Wiki: http:\/\/okfn.org\/wiki\/okcon\/ * http:\/\/www.okfn.org\/okcon\/after\/ On the 17th March 2007 the first all-day Open Knowledge event is taking place in London. This event will bring together individuals and groups from across&hellip;<a href=\"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/?p=2968\">Read more <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">open knowledge conference, limehouse, london, 17th march 2007<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2968"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}