{"id":2554,"date":"2020-06-19T15:34:00","date_gmt":"2020-06-19T15:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/deptford.tv\/?p=2554"},"modified":"2020-06-19T15:34:00","modified_gmt":"2020-06-19T15:34:00","slug":"algorithms-ethics-justice-mad-conference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/?p=2554","title":{"rendered":"Algorithms, Ethics &#038; Justice @MAD conference"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"MAD | AI 2020: Algorithms, Ethics &amp; Justice.\" width=\"680\" height=\"383\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/EVccRQpYEcs?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><figcaption>Algorithms, Ethics &amp; Justice by Adnan Hadzi<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Adnan presented Algorithms, Ethics &amp; Justice at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mad-conferences.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">MAD conference<\/a>. In order to lay the foundations for a discussion around the argument  that the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies benefits  the powerful few, focussing on their own existential concerns, the paper  will narrow down the analysis of the argument to social justice and  jurisprudence (i.e. the philosophy of law), considering also the  historical context. The paper explores the notion of humanised  artificial intelligence in order to discuss potential challenges society  might face in the future. The paper does not discuss current forms and  applications of artificial intelligence, as, so far, there is no AI  technology, which is self-conscious and self-aware, being able to deal  with emotional and social intelligence. It is a discussion around AI as a  speculative hypothetical entity. One could the ask, if such a  speculative self-conscious hardware\/software system were created at what  point could one talk of personhood? And what criteria could there be in  order to say an AI system was capable of committing AI crimes?The paper will discuss the construction of the legal system through  the lens of political involvement of what one may want to consider to be  powerful elites. Before discussing these aspects the paper will clarify  the notion of \u201cpowerful elites\u201d. In doing so the paper will be  demonstrating that it is difficult to prove that the adoption of AI  technologies is undertaken in a way which mainly serves a powerful class  in society. Nevertheless, analysing the culture around AI technologies  with regard to the nature of law with a philosophical and sociological  focus enables one to demonstrate a utilitarian and authoritarian trend  in the adoption of AI technologiesThe paper will then look, in a more detailed manner, into theories  analysing the historical and social systematisation, or one may say  disposition, of laws, and the impingement of neo-liberal tendencies upon  the adoption of AI technologies. The regulatory, self-governing  potential of AI algorithms and the justification by authority of the  current adoption of AI technologies within civil society will be  analysed next. The paper will propose an alternative, some might say  practically unattainable, approach to the current legal system by  looking into restorative justice for AI crimes, and how the ethics of  care, through social contracts, could be applied to AI technologies. In  conclusion the paper will discuss affect and humanised artificial  intelligence with regards to the emotion of shame, when dealing with AI  crimes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Adnan presented Algorithms, Ethics &amp; Justice at the MAD conference. In order to lay the foundations for a discussion around the argument that the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies benefits the powerful few, focussing on their own existential concerns, the paper will narrow down the analysis of the argument to social justice and jurisprudence&hellip;<a href=\"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/?p=2554\">Read more <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Algorithms, Ethics &#038; Justice @MAD conference<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,14,15,16,21,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-events","category-presentations","category-projects","category-publications","category-reports","category-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dorothea.tv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}